http://bytebot.disqus.com/enMon, 16 Feb 2004 09:25:23 -0000http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2004/02/14/shared-source#comment-18714757<p>No, they didn't want it, but it got leaked. Oh well, it's a lot of code...that I'd never want to look at. And probably not want to hire someone that has looked at it before too.</p>byteMon, 16 Feb 2004 09:25:23 -0000http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2004/02/14/shared-source#comment-18714755<p>More MS code leaks!!<br>Poor guys. Or maybe their getting whats coming to them??</p><p><a href="http://www.ircspy.com/default.asp#Another%20MS%20leak:%20Office%20XP%20SP3%20beta" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ircspy.com/default.asp#Another%20MS%20leak:%20Office%20XP%20SP3%20beta">http://www.ircspy.com/defau...</a></p>RubenSun, 15 Feb 2004 06:47:21 -0000http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2004/02/14/shared-source#comment-18714753<p>I dont think Microsoft wanted their source code to be readily available. Some more info on this at<br><a href="http://www.ircspy.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.ircspy.com">www.ircspy.com</a></p><p><a href="http://www.ircspy.com/default.asp#More%20attacks%20likely%20after%20Microsoft%20code%20leaks" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ircspy.com/default.asp#More%20attacks%20likely%20after%20Microsoft%20code%20leaks">http://www.ircspy.com/defau...</a></p>RubenSun, 15 Feb 2004 06:42:42 -0000