<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Colin Charles Agenda - Latest Comments in Fedora and non-free</title><link>http://bytebot.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bytebot.disqus.com/fedora_and_non_free/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:53:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Fedora and non-free</title><link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2004/03/13/fedora-and-non-free#comment-18714952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You seem to think &lt;a href="http://fedora.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="fedora.us"&gt;fedora.us&lt;/a&gt; would be replacing my repository. But the goals are completely different. Whereas I build packages for 7 distributions (and counting), the &lt;a href="http://fedora.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="fedora.us"&gt;fedora.us&lt;/a&gt; people only bother to build for the latest Fedora Core releases. Not Red Hat Enterprise, not from the same source and with a lot more overhead than a single man can stand anyway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lots of things differ and I think they will for a long time, no matter what you throw at it ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dag Wieers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:53:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fedora and non-free</title><link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2004/03/13/fedora-and-non-free#comment-18714950</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey!!! Lets all go and buy a Windows XP CD from Low Yatt!! I hear its only RM5!! And they have these cool DVDs&lt;br&gt;which contain all the Windows versions plus Office XP!!  YAY!!!!&lt;br&gt;Or if you want the open-source version, download it from IRC!!!&lt;br&gt;YAY!!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ruben</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:56:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fedora and non-free</title><link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2004/03/13/fedora-and-non-free#comment-18714948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, but currently the 3rd party repo's contain what the Extras contain too...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byte</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fedora and non-free</title><link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2004/03/13/fedora-and-non-free#comment-18714946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Non-free stuff won't be in Fedora Extras or Fedora Alternatives, but in 3rd party add-ons repositories only.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2004 08:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>