<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Colin Charles Agenda - Latest Comments in Checking in photography equipment?</title><link>http://bytebot.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bytebot.disqus.com/checking_in_photography_equipment/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:42:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Checking in photography equipment?</title><link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/06/13/checking-in-photography-equipment#comment-18720942</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is not specific to the US. I would *NOT* trust *ANY* airline with valuables in the checked-in luggages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hubert Figuière</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:42:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Checking in photography equipment?</title><link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/06/13/checking-in-photography-equipment#comment-18720941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Lotso: No, its a Sigma 30/1.4. And I know the 50/1.4 canon isn't a L lens. I just have a preference to L lenses, if they do exist in the size I'm after. BTW, tried the 50/1.2, cannot justify the extra cost for the extra stop. (and I hate the feeling of going to the store to want to buy it and returning home empty handed).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only benefit? Same filter size as the other L lenses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do I really care? Nope, since I have an investment in filters for the 50mm anyway (I use them for colour infrared)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Hub, Gen: Yes, it seems like the only way is to hand carry stuff, and fly lighter. Or just not take gear to the US...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byte</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:05:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Checking in photography equipment?</title><link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/06/13/checking-in-photography-equipment#comment-18720939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didnt know that canon makes a 30mm f1.4? Shouldn't that be a sigma since canon is 35mm?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ALSo the 50mm 1.4 is not an L lens&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lotso</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:35:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Checking in photography equipment?</title><link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/06/13/checking-in-photography-equipment#comment-18720937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hand-carry.  The only way to travel with expensive equipment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gen Kanai</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Checking in photography equipment?</title><link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/06/13/checking-in-photography-equipment#comment-18720936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fly lighter. Less camera gear, less laptops.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hubert Figuière</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:41:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>